ArticleJournal of global health2025
A legal battle between Ecuadorian citizens and corporate power.
Article in Journal of global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For decades, transnational corporations/companies have been using various strategies (e.g. lobbying for the reduction of taxation) to position their products and influence dietary habits, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), 'health taxes' are one of the most effective public health measures for reducing the negative effects of unhealthy products, which have been shown to add to the burden adiposity-related cardiovascular diseases, cancers, and diabetes mellitus. Yet despite the abundant evidence on these impacts and the innovative tax policies implemented by neighbouring countries, on 10 January 2023, Ecuador issued Decreto 645 - an unprecedented presidential decree which reduced excise taxes on products harmful to health and the environment, including cigarettes and e-cigarettes, alcoholic beverages, sugary industrial drinks, plastic covers, firearms, and ammunition. The rationale for this government decree was to strengthen citizen security, fight against smuggling and informality, and mitigate the impact of inflation on the economy. In this viewpoint, we share the experience of how members of the civil society built a group called Colectivo Todos Por la Vida (translated as 'Collective All for Life') and led a legal fight to defend the health and well-being of the Ecuadorian population against local corporate power. The lessons learned could be useful to other countries in similar scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.