ArticleJournal of vision2025
Optical material properties affect detection of deformation of non-rigid rotating objects, but only slightly.
Article in Journal of vision, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Visual information for the identification of nonrigid motion.Journal of vision · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although rigid three-dimensional (3D) motion perception has been extensively studied, the visual detection of non-rigid 3D motion remains underexplored, particularly with regard to its interactions with material perception. In natural environments with various materials, image movements produced by geometry-dependent optical effects, such as diffuse shadings, specular highlights, and transparent glitters, impose computational challenges for accurately perceiving object deformation. This study examines how optical material properties influence human perception of non-rigid deformations. In a two-interval forced choice task, observers were shown a pair of rigid and non-rigid objects and asked to select the one that appeared more deformed. The object deformation varied across six intensity levels, and the stimuli included four materials (dotted matte, glossy, mirror, and transparent). We found that the material has only a small effect on deformation detection, with the threshold being slightly higher for transparent than other materials. The results remained the same regardless of the viewing angles, light field conditions (Experiment 1), and the deformation type (Experiment 2). These results show the robust capacity of the human visual system to perceive non-rigid object motion in complex natural visual environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.