Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40354052›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

First-Generation and Low-Income Students in the National Medical Student Body.

Sophia C Kamran, Isabella R Pompa, Hillary Brenda Nguyen, Jaeyoon Cha, Kevin E Salinas, Andrzej Niemierko, Neha Vapiwala

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sophia C KamranDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Isabella R PompaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Hillary Brenda NguyenHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jaeyoon ChaHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Kevin E SalinasTransitional Year Program, John Peter Smith Hospital, Fort Worth, Texas.
Andrzej NiemierkoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Neha VapiwalaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Diverse representation within the US medical student body and physician workforce is an important step to help address known pervasive health care disparities. Objective: To evaluate US medical school first-year matriculants between 2002 and 2015 through a disaggregated lens, parsing out low-income and first-generation students and understanding their intersectionality with racial and ethnic groups. Design, Setting, and Participants: Using deidentified student-level data of allopathic US medical school matriculants from the Association of American Medical Colleges Matriculating Student Questionnaire from 2002 through 2015, this cross-sectional study obtained demographic data with a focus on first-generation and low-income status. Data were analyzed from January 2022 through July 2024. Exposures: Race and ethnicity, first-generation medical student status, underrepresented in medicine (URIM) status (ie, identifying as Hispanic only, non-Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native or Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander only, or non-Hispanic Black/African American only), parental income, total student debt, and graduation status. Main Outcomes and Measures: Trends of first-generation and low-income students were evaluated longitudinally. Medical student parental income was compared with that of the US general population by race and ethnicity and generation status for the years 2002, 2008, and 2015. A multivariable logistic regression model was performed to evaluate URIM, parental income, first-generation status, and attrition from medical school. Results: Between 2002 and 2015, a total of 256 513 students were included in this analysis (48.0% women; 14.7% URIM; 7.4% first-generation). The proportion of first-generation students decreased from 8.7% in 2002 to 7.1% in 2015. When comparing student parental income with that of the general population for 2002, 2008, and 2015, the top 5% of households by income were overrepresented among non-first-generation medical students (21.1% in 2002, 31.5% in 2008, and 26.4% in 2015), while the parental income representation of first-generation students was more aligned with the general population (1.4% in 2002, 2.8% in 2008, and 0.8% in 2015). The graduation rate of first-generation students was 2.1% lower than the graduation rate of non-first-generation students. Medical students were more likely to not graduate if they were low-income (odds ratio [OR], 1.71 [95% CI, 1.60-1.84]), URIM (OR, 2.07 [95% CI, 1.98-2.17]), or first-generation (OR, 1.56 [95% CI, 1.47-1.67]). Conclusions and Relevance: This cross-sectional study of US medical student matriculants found a decrease in the number of matriculants who were first-generation. These students were at significant risk of attrition from medical school, particularly when considering the intersectionality with low-income and URIM identities. These results suggest a need to recruit and retain these students, so that the physician workforce better reflects the backgrounds and experiences of the communities served.

Indexed as

PovertyStudents, MedicalAdultCross-Sectional StudiesEthnicityFemaleHumansMaleSchools, MedicalSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40354052
PMCPMC12070234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.