Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40354050›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2025

Bedtime vs Morning Antihypertensive Medications in Frail Older Adults: The BedMed-Frail Randomized Clinical Trial.

Scott R Garrison, Erik R E Youngson, Danielle A Perry, Farah N Campbell, Christina S Korownyk, Lee A Green, Michael R Kolber, Jessica E M Kirkwood, G Michael Allan, Roni Y Kraut and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter StudyPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04054648 (Does the Potential Benefit of Bedtime Antihypertensive Prescribing Extend to Frail Populations? The "BedMed-Frail" Randomized Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04054648 nacompletednot on this map

Does the Potential Benefit of Bedtime Antihypertensive Prescribing Extend to Frail Populations? The "BedMed-Frail" Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of AlbertaRan2020 to 2024Enrolled776ConditionsHypertension, DementiaArmsBedtime administration of the participant's pre-existing antihypertensive medications
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Timing of antihypertensive medication (bedtimeFrontiers in pharmacology · 2026
    Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Recent developments and challenges in hypertensive dementia over the past year.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Scott R GarrisonPragmatic Trials Collaborative, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Erik R E YoungsonProvincial Research Data Services, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Danielle A PerryCollege of Family Physicians of Canada, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.
Farah N CampbellPragmatic Trials Collaborative, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Christina S KorownykPragmatic Trials Collaborative, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Lee A GreenPragmatic Trials Collaborative, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Michael R KolberPragmatic Trials Collaborative, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Jessica E M KirkwoodPragmatic Trials Collaborative, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
G Michael AllanCollege of Family Physicians of Canada, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.
Roni Y KrautPragmatic Trials Collaborative, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Finlay A McAlisterAlberta Strategy for Patient Oriented Research Support Unit (AbSPORU), Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Michael D HillDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Jeffrey A BakalProvincial Research Data Services, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The effect of antihypertensive administration time on major adverse cardiovascular events is unclear, and has never been studied in frail older adults, for whom risks and benefits may differ from the general population. Objective: To determine, in frail seniors, the effect of bedtime vs morning administration of antihypertensive medications on major cardiovascular events and death, as well as on potentially ischemic or hypotensive adverse events. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter, open-label, pragmatic randomized clinical trial recruited from 13 continuing care facilities in Canada (17 wards; 14 long-term care and 3 supportive-living wards) from May 25, 2020, to September 18, 2023, with follow-up until February 29, 2024. Residents with hypertension and at least 1 once-daily antihypertensive medication were included. Data analysis was from March to August 2024. Interventions: Patients were randomized 1:1 to taking all once-daily antihypertensive medications either at bedtime (intervention) or per usual care control (largely morning use). Main Outcomes and Measures: The composite primary outcome was first occurrence of all-cause death or either hospitalization or emergency department (ED) visit for stroke, acute coronary syndrome, or heart failure. All-cause unplanned hospitalization or ED visits, falls and fractures, decubitus ulcers, and worsening cognition or behavioral problems were also assessed. Results: A total of 776 older adults (median [IQR] age, 88 [81-92] years; 562 female [72.4%]; 664 [85.6%] with some degree of dementia; 367 [47.3%] with diabetes; 307 [39.6%] with coronary artery disease) were randomized to bedtime (394 participants) vs usual care (382 participants) administration and were followed-up for a median (IQR) of 415 (251-735) days. Of 320 primary outcome events, 293 (91.6%) were deaths; there was no difference in primary outcomes for bedtime vs usual care in a modified intention-to-treat analysis (29.4 vs 31.5 events per 100 patient-years; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.88; 95% CI, 0.71-1.11; P = .28). Other outcomes were similarly no different between groups, excepting all-cause unplanned hospitalization and ED visits, which favored bedtime (22.6 vs 30.0 events per 100 patient-years; aHR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.57-0.96; P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial of antihypertensive medication timing, switching antihypertensives to bedtime failed to reduce a composite of death or major cardiovascular events that were primarily all-cause death, and had no effect on potentially ischemic and hypotensive adverse events, suggesting that in a population of frail older adults, administration time had little or no influence on the benefits and risks of antihypertensive medication. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04054648.

Indexed as

Antihypertensive AgentsFrail ElderlyHypertensionAgedAged, 80 and overCanadaDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleTime FactorsAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

PMID40354050
PMCPMC12070236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.