ArticleDiscover oncology2025
Pan-cancer predictive survival model development and evaluation using electronic health record and genetic data across 10 cancer types.
Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The growing burden of cancer and recent surge in healthcare data availability call for new ways of analysing this multifactorial disease and improving patient outcomes. The aim of this study is to develop and evaluate prognostic cancer survival models across ten common cancer types based on a large patient sample. We compare the performance of different machine learning algorithms and assess the added value of genetic information in cancer prognosis. We also provide ways to improve model explainabilty which is critical for model adoption in clinical practice. This study included data from 9977 patients with bladder, breast, colorectal, endometrial, glioma, leukaemia, lung, ovarian, prostate, and renal cancers. Genetic data collected through the 100,000 Genomes Project was linked with clinical and demographic data provided by the National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, Hospital Episode Statistics and Office for National Statistics. More than 500 prognostic features were assessed and four machine learning algorithms including Elastic Net Cox proportional hazards regression, random survival forest, gradient boosting survival and DeepSurv neural network were developed in this study. Most models achieved good performance varying from 60% in bladder cancer to 80% in glioma with the average C-index of 72% across all cancer types. Different machine learning methods achieved similar performance with DeepSurv model slightly underperforming compared to other methods. Addition of genetic data improved performance in endometrial, glioma, ovarian and prostate cancers, showing its potential importance for cancer prognosis. Patient's age, stage, grade, referral route, waiting times, pre-existing conditions, previous hospital utilisation, tumour mutational burden and mutations in gene TP53 were among the most important features in cancer survival modelling. By offering a comprehensive set of predictive models for cancer survival, this study fills a critical gap in our understanding of cancer prognosis and provides new tools for informing cancer treatment and consequently improving patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.