Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40353966›Full record

ArticleDoklady. Biochemistry and biophysics2025

Assessment of the Damage Index and Its Dynamics in Patients with Non-Systemic Variants of Juvenile Arthritis during the Treatment with Biologics.

Z A Kolkhidova, I P Nikishina, S I Glukhova

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Doklady. Biochemistry and biophysics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Z A KolkhidovaNasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology, Moscow, Russia. kolkhidovaz@gmail.com.
I P NikishinaNasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology, Moscow, Russia.
S I GlukhovaNasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology, Moscow, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is characterized by a high risk of joint destruction, extra-articular changes, and rapidly progressive disability. The CHAQ (Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire) and  X-ray are often used to assess functional impairment and the degree of irreversible damage, but both methods have limitations. The Juvenile Arthritis Damage Index (JADI) has been developed to comprehensively assess the biological prognosis of JIA, which includes articular (JADI-A) and extra-articular (JADI-E) damage evaluation. The use of the JADI may be an effective tool for predicting and monitoring the effectiveness of JIA therapy in real clinical practice conditions. THE 

aimof the study was to identify correlations of the JADI index with features of clinical manifestations in patients with non-systemic variants of JIA who had no experience with biologic therapy (B) and to evaluate the impact of lesions defined through the JADI damage index value on predicting response to B. MATERIALS AND

methods. This open prospective study included 150 children with non-systemic JIA variants with no history of biologic therapy. The mean age was 12.2 ± 4.6 years, 60% were girls; 112 patients were examined in dynamics after 6 or 12 months from the beginning of therapy with biologics. Clinical and anamnestic evaluations, including detailed assessment of joint status and JADI-A and JADI-E scores, were performed on all patients.

results. The study showed that 50% of patients had damage on the JADI score, with 43% having JADI-A+ and 23% having JADI-E+. Both articular and extra-articular damage were present in 15% (n = 23) of children. Among those with JADI-A, flexion contractures of the knee joints were most frequently noted in 39%, elbow joints in 28%, and limitation of movement in the cervical spine in 26%. Extra-articular injuries were more frequently presented as avascular necrosis of bones, confirmed by imaging methods (41%), and a significant difference in limb length was observed in 35% of patients. The presence of articular changes was significantly associated with positivity for antinuclear antibody, rheumatoid factor, and anticyclic citrullinated peptide, as well as the absence of enthesitis, elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate and С-reactive protein, high clinical activity, Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score, CHAQ values, a history of glucocorticoid therapy, and low adherence to treatment. Polyarticular onset involving small hand joints and a tendency for rapid contracture formation were also associated with positive JADI-A values. The onset of polyarthritis with involvement of the small joints of the hands and a tendency to fast contracture formation were also associated with JADI-A positivity. As a result of therapy with biologics prescribed in routine clinical practice, the vast majority of patients achieved stable status without signs of damage or the value of the damage index remained unchanged. In 26 (23%) patients, JADI-A scores improved with complete resolution of contractures or increased amplitude of joint movement. In 10 (9%) cases, there was progression of the lesions with no established correlation with the choice of a specific drug, including 6 (5%) children with irreversible changes despite the use of targeted therapy.

conclusions: The JADI is a useful and accessible tool for clinical assessment of articular and extra-articular lesions, reflecting the prognosis of JIA and an objective indicator of therapy efficacy.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic AgentsArthritis, JuvenileBiological ProductsAdolescentChildFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexAntirheumatic AgentsBiological Productsbiologicsefficacy of therapyfunctional impairmentjoint contracturesjuvenile idiopathic arthritisoutcomes of juvenile arthritispredicting response to biologicsThe Juvenile Arthritis Damage Index JADI,

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.