ArticleVisual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art2025
Artificial intelligence-assisted diagnosis of early allograft dysfunction based on ultrasound image and data.
Article in Visual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early hemodynamic assessment and longitudinal imaging for predicting graft outcomes post-transplant.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Pathophysiological mechanisms of cell death affecting graft survival in liver transplantation.World journal of transplantation · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Early allograft dysfunction (EAD) significantly affects liver transplantation prognosis. This study evaluated the effectiveness of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted methods in accurately diagnosing EAD and identifying its causes. The primary metric for assessing the accuracy was the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated and analyzed to compare the performance of the AI models with each other and with radiologists. EAD classification followed the criteria established by Olthoff et al. A total of 582 liver transplant patients who underwent transplantation between December 2012 and June 2021 were selected. Among these, 117 patients (mean age 33.5 ± 26.5 years, 80 men) were evaluated. The ultrasound parameters, images, and clinical information of patients were extracted from the database to train the AI model. The AUC for the ultrasound-spectrogram fusion network constructed from four ultrasound images and medical data was 0.968 (95%CI: 0.940, 0.991), outperforming radiologists by 30% for all metrics. AI assistance significantly improved diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity (P < 0.050) for both experienced and less-experienced physicians. EAD lacks efficient diagnosis and causation analysis methods. The integration of AI and ultrasound enhances diagnostic accuracy and causation analysis. By modeling only images and data related to blood flow, the AI model effectively analyzed patients with EAD caused by abnormal blood supply. Our model can assist radiologists in reducing judgment discrepancies, potentially benefitting patients with EAD in underdeveloped regions. Furthermore, it enables targeted treatment for those with abnormal blood supply.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.