ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2025
Prognostic value of MIB-1 index in meningioma: a retrospective cohort study to establish an optimal cutoff for recurrence and survival.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Time-dependent prognostic value of automated Ki67 assessment and its integration with molecular risk profiling in WHO grade 2 meningioma.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2026Article
- MIB-1 index predicts low recurrence risk after subtotal resection of meningiomas: a retrospective study of 505 patients.Neurosurgical review · 2026Article
- Outcomes of early versus late radiotherapy in grade 2 meningiomas: a National retrospective analysis from the TROD neuro-oncology group.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
- Somatostatin receptor PET-guided treatment and artificial intelligence applications in meningioma: a comprehensive review.American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePredicting long-term outcomes after meningioma resection remains challenging. Ki-67/MIB-1 correlates with recurrence, yet its optimal cutoff is undefined. This study aims to establish a threshold that enhances risk stratification, improves recurrence prediction, and informs postoperative surveillance and adjuvant treatment strategies.
methodsThis is retrospective study of patients who underwent meningioma resection. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis determined the optimal MIB-1 cutoff for predicting recurrence and survival, providing area under the curve (AUC). This cutoff was then applied in Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and multivariable Cox regressions, controlling for age, sex, tumor diameter, tumor location, extent of resection, and adjuvant radiotherapy.
resultsA total of 404 patients were included. Median age was 55.0 years (range: 16-85) and 72.3% were female. The cohort primarily consisted of WHO Grade 1 (69.6%) and Grade 2 (30.0%) meningiomas. An optimal MIB-1 index cutoff of 4.1% was identified using ROC analysis with the Youden index for predicting recurrence (AUC = 0.661, p < 0.001) and survival (AUC = 0.717, p < 0.001). 241 patients (59.7%) had a MIB-1 < 4.1%, and 163 (40.3%) had a MIB-1 ≥ 4.1%. Patients with MIB-1 ≥ 4.1% had a higher risk of recurrence (HR = 2.9, p = 0.009) and mortality (HR = 2.8, p = 0.036). Patients with MIB-1 ≥ 4.1% demonstrated shorter recurrence-free survival (RFS) (119.0 vs. 129.0 months, p < 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (163.0 vs. 229.0 months, p < 0.001).
conclusionWe identified an optimal and actionable MIB-1 index cutoff of 4.1% which independently predicted recurrence, mortality, and shorter RFS and OS for patients undergoing meningioma resection. As the first study to establish and validate this threshold, our findings highlight its potential as an adjunct prognostic tool to refine risk stratification and guide postoperative management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40353934What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.