ArticleUrologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025
[Management of complications in reconstructive pelvic floor surgery].
Article in Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reconstructive pelvic floor surgery offers a wide range of surgical options for treating urinary incontinence, organ prolapse and other pelvic floor disorders. The aim is always to choose the safest and most effective procedure to improve the quality of life of those affected. In addition to expertise in making the appropriate diagnosis and surgical experience, knowledge of how to deal with complications is always essential. When categorising complications, a distinction is made between early and late complications, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and general and procedure-specific complications. If complications arise, conservative and surgical treatment options should be known. The starting point here is adequate diagnostics, which may include basic examinations, sonography, endoscopy and imaging techniques. The aim is to be able to accurately assess the extent of the complication in order to choose the appropriate therapy-preferably conservative methods. Particular challenges in the management of complications in reconstructive pelvic floor surgery are posed by complications with foreign materials. Surgical complication management can be very complex, requires a high level of surgical expertise and may also require an interdisciplinary approach. Gaining expertise in managing complications, whether conservative or surgical methods, can be challenging, especially when aiming to avoid causing those complications yourself. Thus, the best complication management is preventive: knowing the patient well, diagnosing the disease precisely and knowing one's own limits!
Indexed as
Identifiers
40353890What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.