ArticleRheumatology international2025
Assessment and management of midfoot osteoarthritis by podiatrists in Australia: a cross-sectional survey of current practice.
Article in Rheumatology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Midfoot osteoarthritis (OA) is a common and disabling condition, yet lacks clinical guidelines for its assessment and management. This study aimed to investigate strategies used by Australian podiatrists to assess and manage midfoot OA. An exploratory cross-sectional survey of podiatrists working in Australia was conducted. Respondents were invited through professional organisations to complete an online questionnaire on their usual assessment and management practices for midfoot OA, based on a vignette. Between November 2022 and July 2023, 103 participants (52% women, mean age 40 years) with an average of 15 years of clinical experience responded. Physical assessments (including history taking and musculoskeletal assessments) (96%) and medical imaging (90%) were commonly used diagnostic methods, with palpation (96%), passive movement testing (95%) and x-ray imaging (62%) frequently reported. Associated impairments were assessed with range of motion testing of the midfoot (96%), gait analysis (95%), functional tests (83%), muscle strength (72%), and observation of static alignment (71%), including foot posture (69%). Most participants assessed comorbidities (93%), body composition (66%) and cognitive/psychosocial impairments (62%). Treatment approaches included footwear advice (97%), orthotic therapy (85%), strapping/taping (81%), education (79%), and exercise therapy (75%). One-third (34%) expected a 'satisfactory' treatment response within two months, and 36% would refer to another healthcare practitioner for co-management between two and three months if treatment was ineffective. A wide range of approaches are used to assess and manage midfoot OA. These findings have potential to inform the design of future studies in developing valid assessment approaches and effective interventions for this condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.