Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40353875›Full record

ArticleClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2026

Evidence of bioprosthetic valve dysfunction during three-year follow-up following TAVR.

Verena Veulemans, Jacqueline Heermann, Rik Adrichem, Salome Hecht, Philipp C Seppelt, Thijmen W Hokken, Rutger-Jan Nuis, Mohamed Abdel-Wahab, Nicolas M van Mieghem, David Leistner and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01805739 (Multi Modal Cardiac Imaging Prior Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01805739 recruitingnot on this map

Multi Modal Cardiac Imaging Prior Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI)

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorKlinik für Kardiologie, Pneumologie und AngiologieRan2013 to 2030Enrolled5,000ConditionsAortic Valve Stenosis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Verena VeulemansDivision of Cardiology, Pulmonology and Vascular Medicine, Heinrich Heine University, Medical Faculty, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany. verena.veulemans@web.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2744-2154
Jacqueline HeermannDivision of Cardiology, Pulmonology and Vascular Medicine, Heinrich Heine University, Medical Faculty, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Rik AdrichemDepartment of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Salome HechtDepartment for Cardiology, Heartcenter Leipzig, Strümpellstr. 39, 04289, Leipzig, Germany.
Philipp C SeppeltDepartment for Cardiology, Heartcenter Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany.
Thijmen W HokkenDepartment of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Rutger-Jan NuisDepartment of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Mohamed Abdel-WahabDepartment for Cardiology, Heartcenter Leipzig, Strümpellstr. 39, 04289, Leipzig, Germany.
Nicolas M van MieghemDepartment of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
David LeistnerDepartment for Cardiology, Heartcenter Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany.
Marc M VorpahlDepartment for Cardiology, Heartcenter Siegburg, Ringstr. 49, 53721, Siegburg, Germany.
Tobias ZeusDivision of Cardiology, Pulmonology and Vascular Medicine, Heinrich Heine University, Medical Faculty, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTranscatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has increased significantly in younger patients and patients at lower surgical risk. In this retrospective multicenter study, we aimed to assess for bioprosthetic valve dysfunction (BVD) during three-year follow-up (FU) and potential differences between self-expandable (SEV) and balloon-expandable valves (BEV) under real-world conditions.

methodsEndpoints were defined according to VARC-3 criteria, including VARC composite endpoints during three-year FU.

resultsA total of 1233 patients with tricuspid aortic valve stenosis, who underwent TAVR with contemporary transcatheter heart valve (THV) devices from three different tertiary care centers were included. One-fifth of the study population showed BVD at three-year FU (BVD[-]: n = 957;77.6%; BVD[+]: n = 276;22.4%). Non-structural valve deterioration (NSVD) was the most represented category (8.5%) followed by structural valve deterioration (SVD, 5.3%). BVD was more common in association with BEV as compared with SEV (60.9% vs 39.1%; p < 0.001) owing to higher rates of SVD (13.5% vs 9.5%; p = 0.028) and NSVD (17.9% vs. 13.8%; p = 0.048). Subclinical leaflet thrombosis was only documented in BEV (1.7%, p < 0.001). At three years, all-cause mortality was higher in BVD+ patients (BVD[-] vs. BVD[+]: 13.2% vs. 22.5%; HR: 1.99; 95%-CI: 1.39-2.85; p < 0.001*) but did not differ between THV platform.

conclusionBVD after TAVR is common and associated with higher all-cause mortality. Despite a preponderance of BVD in association with balloon-expandable valves, mortality rates remain similar between THV platforms. CLINICAL

trial registrationNCT01805739.

Indexed as

Aortic ValveAortic Valve StenosisBioprosthesisHeart Valve ProsthesisPostoperative ComplicationsProsthesis FailureTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleProsthesis DesignRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsBioprosthetic dysfunctionTAVITAVR

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.