Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40353857›Full record

ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2026

Proton therapy in young breast cancer patients with germline TP53 and ATM mutations: a case series.

Pierre Loap, Farid Goudjil, Ludovic de Marzi, Kim Cao, Rémi Dendale, Youlia Kirova

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pierre LoapDepartment of radiation oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France. pierre.loap@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8863-8110
Farid GoudjilProton Therapy Center (CPO), Institut Curie, Orsay, France.
Ludovic de MarziDepartment of radiation oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Kim CaoDepartment of radiation oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Rémi DendaleDepartment of radiation oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Youlia KirovaDepartment of radiation oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundYoung breast cancer patients with germline radiosensitivity mutations, such as in TP53 and ATM, face an increased risk of radiation-induced toxicities and secondary malignancies. Proton therapy offers dosimetric advantages by reducing the radiation exposure of healthy tissues, potentially mitigating these risks. However, clinical data on the use of proton therapy in this specific population are limited. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe conducted a single-center retrospective study in patients with non-metastatic breast cancer with germline TP53 or ATM mutations treated with intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) at the Institut Curie Proton Therapy Center between June 2019 and November 2024. Patient demographics, treatment characteristics, and toxicity profiles were analyzed. Acute and late toxicities were graded according to CTCAE v5.0. Survival outcomes were calculated from the date of histological diagnosis.

resultsFour young patients (median age 25 years; range 24-29) with TP53 (n = 2) or ATM (n = 2) mutations received IMPT targeting the chest wall and regional lymph nodes. All patients had hormone receptor-positive, node-positive breast cancer; one patient was also HER2 positive. Treatments included chemotherapy, surgery, and adjuvant hormonal therapy; three patients received additional targeted therapies. The median mean heart dose was 1.25 Gy (range 0.5-1.5 Gy). One patient experienced acute grade 2 radiodermatitis, while two patients had grade 1 radiodermatitis. After a median follow-up of 18 months (range 11-49 months), one patient exhibited persistent grade 1 skin pigmentation. No other late toxicities, including cardiac or pulmonary complications, were observed. There were no secondary malignancies or recurrences, resulting in 100% overall and recurrence-free survival.

conclusionProton therapy was well tolerated in this small cohort of young breast cancer patients with germline TP53 or ATM mutations, demonstrating minimal acute toxicity and no significant late effects over a median follow-up of 18 months. These preliminary findings suggest that proton therapy may be a safe treatment option for this high-risk population. Larger studies with extended follow-up are necessary to confirm these results and to inform clinical guidelines.

Indexed as

Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsBreast NeoplasmsGerm-Line MutationProton TherapyTumor Suppressor Protein p53AdultFemaleHumansRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsATM protein, humanTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53ATM mutationBreast cancerProton therapyRadiosensitivityTP53 mutation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.