ReviewEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2025
Evolving fracture management: the role of helical plating in orthopaedic trauma surgery - a narrative review.
Review in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Periprosthetic fractures of the knee.EFORT open reviews · 2026Article
- Cumulative Risk for Periprosthetic Fracture and Operative Treatment Options After Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty with a Modular and Tapered Revision Device-A Consecutive Series of 117 Cases in a Mid-Term Duration.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis narrative review systematically compiles and analyzes existing literature on the use of helical plates in orthopaedic trauma surgery. By synthesizing data across various study types, it provides a comprehensive overview of the biomechanical characteristics, clinical outcomes, and anatomical advantages of helical plating.
methodsA systematic search was performed using PubMed and Web of Science databases, employing defined search terms to identify relevant studies. Single case reports were excluded, while structured case series were included. Retrieved studies were categorized into five groups: simulation studies, biomechanical studies, case series, clinical comparative studies, and anatomical studies.
resultsThe review identified studies from 1992 to 2023, with most of the research focusing on the femur (7 studies) and humerus (6 studies). Biomechanical studies (7) were the most common, followed by clinical case series (7), comparative studies (4), and finite element analyses (3). European institutions contributed to the majority of research, with additional studies from Asia and South America. No randomized controlled trials were found. Helical plates demonstrated comparable stability to straight plates, with distinct biomechanical advantages: superior torsional resistance in femoral fractures and improved neurovascular safety in humeral fractures.
conclusionHelical plates offer a viable alternative to straight plates in long bone fractures, particularly for protecting neurovascular structures. Optimal designs vary by location, with 45° helical plates recommended for humeral minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis, 180° helical plates for young patients with femoral fractures, and 90° helical plates in geriatric double plating constructs. Further high-quality research is needed to establish definitive clinical guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.