Trial reportEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2025
Scintigraphy for the diagnosis of primary unrecognised fractures in multiple trauma patients - a prospective, blinded, monocentric study.
Trial report in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAfter structured (S3 guideline, ATLS
methods26 patients aged 18 years or older (median 53.5 years, 4 female, 22 male) with an ISS ≥ 9 were evaluated by an orthopaedic and trauma surgeon using skeletal scintigraphy after completion of standardised trauma room diagnostics and tertiary survey, a median of 7 days after trauma. All clinical and diagnostic examinations were then analysed and a final consensus was reached on the bony injuries. An evaluation of each procedure against the consensus was performed for the whole body and five body regions.
resultsSkeletal scintigraphy was clearly superior to the established method (sensitivity 98.8% vs. 75.4%). Of the 60 additional bony injuries identified, 25 were treated without therapeutic consequences. Twenty-nine were treated conservatively without additional immobilisation and five with additional immobilisation. One unnecessary immobilisation was ended and no surgical treatment was required.
conclusionThree-phase whole-body skeletal scintigraphy is a low-risk, highly sensitive tool for reducing the incidence of missed injuries. A more liberal indication for skeletal scintigraphy should be given for injuries of increasing severity and in persons with impaired consciousness or paralysis, to avoid sequelae of missed injuries. CLINICAL
trial registrationThe study was registered at the German Clinical Trails Register (DRKS) with the identifier DRKS00029402.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.