ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2025
Evaluating feature extraction reproducibility across image biomarker standardization initiative-compliant radiomics platforms using a digital phantom.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Radiomics and anaesthetic planning: Quantitative imaging as a new frontier in preoperative risk assessment.World journal of radiology · 2026Review
- Development and internal validation of a high-resolution computed tomography radiomics and three-dimensional deep learning diagnostic prediction model for preoperative differentiation of minimally invasive and invasive adenocarcinoma in subsolid nodules.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Multimodal echocardiographic techniques in the diagnosis of cardiac tumors: applications and recent advances.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- A survival prediction model for leptomeningeal metastasis patients with non-small cell lung cancer based on deep learning.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Integrating dose-volume histogram parameters and radiomics-based machine learning to identify carbon ion radiotherapy-induced acute oral mucositis in patients with head and neck cancer.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Review
- Evaluating feature extraction reproducibility across image biomarker standardization initiative-compliant radiomics platforms using a digital phantom.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this study was to thoroughly analyze the reproducibility of radiomics feature extraction across three Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative (IBSI)-compliant platforms using a digital phantom for benchmarking. It uncovers high consistency among common features while also pointing out the necessity for standardization in computational algorithms and mathematical definitions due to unique platform-specific features.
methodsWe selected three widely used radiomics platforms: LIFEx, Computational Environment for Radiological Research (CERR), and PyRadiomics. Using the IBSI digital phantom, we performed a comparative analysis to extract and benchmark radiomics features. The study design included testing each platform's ability to consistently reproduce radiomics features, with statistical analyses to assess the variability and agreement among the platforms.
resultsThe results indicated varying levels of feature reproducibility across the platforms. Although some features showed high consistency, others varied significantly, highlighting the need for standardized computational algorithms. Specifically, LIFEx and PyRadiomics performed consistently well across many features, whereas CERR showed greater variability in certain feature categories than LIFEx and PyRadiomics.
conclusionThe study findings highlight the need for harmonized feature calculation methods to enhance the reliability and clinical usefulness of radiomics. Additionally, this study recommends incorporating clinical data and establishing benchmarking procedures in future studies to enhance the role of radiomics in personalized medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.