ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2025
GCfix: a fast and accurate fragment length-specific method for correcting GC bias in cell-free DNA.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationCell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis has wide-ranging clinical applications due to its noninvasive nature. However, cfDNA fragmentomics and copy number analysis can be complicated by GC bias. There is a lack of GC correction software based on rigorous cfDNA GC bias analysis. Furthermore, there is no standardized metric for comparing GC bias correction methods across large sample sets, nor a rigorous experiment setup to demonstrate their effectiveness on cfDNA data at various coverage levels.
resultsWe present GCfix, a method for robust GC bias correction in cfDNA data across diverse coverages. Developed following an in-depth analysis of cfDNA GC bias at the region and fragment length levels, GCfix is both fast and accurate. It works on all reference genomes and generates correction factors, tagged BAM files, and corrected coverage tracks. We also introduce two orthogonal performance metrics for (i) comparing the fragment count density distribution of GC content between expected and corrected samples, and (ii) evaluating coverage profile improvement post-correction. GCfix outperforms existing cfDNA GC bias correction methods on these metrics. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: GCfix software and code for reproducing the figures are publicly accessible on GitHub: https://github.com/Rafeed-bot/GCfix_Software.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.