ArticleBlood advances2025
A global survey on practice changes and barriers to the use of direct oral anticoagulants in children.
Article in Blood advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants in pediatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
- Kidney Dysfunction-Associated Intracerebral Haemorrhage: Global Trends and Regional Disparities (1990-2021).Kidney & blood pressure research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractWe aim to describe the patterns of use, practice changes, and emerging challenges after the approval of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for thrombosis management and prevention in children. This cross-sectional survey-based study involved pediatric thrombosis treaters from different institutions around the world. The survey was distributed between January and August 2024. DOAC use and barriers were compared according to the country's income (high-income countries [HICs] vs low- and middle-income countries [LMICs], per World Bank classification). In total, 100 of 103 respondents completed the survey, representing 100 different institutions from 96 cities in 53 countries (31% European, 25% North American, 24% Asian, 12% South American, 5% Oceanian, and 3% African). Eighty-five percent of respondents used DOACs (HICs, 89% vs LMICs, 76%; P = .09). Although DOACs were more commonly used than low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or vitamin K antagonists (VKA) in outpatients, 91% respondents indicated that <50% of their patients were started on DOACs directly, and 62% reported that <50% of children on long-term LMWH/VKA had been switched to DOACs. Lack of pediatric formulations was the most common barrier (39% in HICs, 52% in LMICs); 9% of respondents in HIC vs 29% in LIMC reported no access to DOACs (P = .009), whereas 21% of respondents in HICs vs 3% in LIMCs stated no barriers to their use (P = .02), indicating inequality. Additional barriers included cost and clinician acceptability and limited knowledge, experience, and expertise. The results highlight current gaps in pediatric DOAC use, emphasizing the importance of capacity building, advocacy, and generation of further evidence to inform guidelines and policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.