ArticleBlood advances2025
Real-world survival outcomes in first-line ibrutinib-treated patients with high-risk CLL/SLL.
Article in Blood advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Real-world effectiveness and safety of acalabrutinib in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: Multicentre experience.British journal of haematology · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractIn patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL), high-risk cytogenetic features such as del(17p), del(11q), and unmutated immunoglobulin variable heavy chain (IGHV) may be associated with unfavorable outcomes. In this large retrospective cohort study, data from a nationwide electronic health record-derived deidentified database were analyzed to assess real-world overall survival (rwOS) among patients treated with first-line (1L) ibrutinib with and without high-risk cytogenetic features (ie, del(17p), del(11q), unmutated IGHV). Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to account for differences in patient characteristics between cohorts. Of 1242 patients included, 969 and 273 had high- and non-high-risk CLL/SLL, with a mean age of 70.0 and 70.8 years, and a median follow-up of 32 and 31 months, respectively. Within the high-risk cohort, 32.9%, 36.7%, and 58.7% had the presence of del(17p), del(11q), and unmutated IGHV, respectively. The median rwOS was not reached for either cohort; the hazard ratio (HR) comparing rwOS between the 2 cohorts was 1.09 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79-1.51). In a sensitivity analysis in which del(11q) was not part of the high-risk definition, similar results were found, with a HR of 1.19 (95% CI, 0.86-1.64) and median rwOS not reached for either cohort. Similarly, among the subgroup of patients with Medicare coverage, the HR was 0.98 (95% CI, 0.63-1.53), and median rwOS was not reached. In this real-world study using a large community health care data set, there was no difference in rwOS between patients treated with 1L ibrutinib with and without high-risk cytogenetic features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.