ReviewIntegrative and comparative biology2025
Complexities of Phenological Shifts for Plant-Pollinator Interactions and Ways Forward.
Review in Integrative and comparative biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Climate Warming Drives the Breakdown of Plant-Pollinator Mutualisms Despite Phenological Synchrony.Global change biology · 2026Article
- Separated Sexes, Shared Consequences: Disentangling Predictors of Genetic Diversity in Dioecious Angiosperms.Ecology and evolution · 2026Review
- Honeybee aging as an emergent property of a self-organizing dissipative system.Frontiers in systems biology · 2026Article
- Augmenting plant-pollinator interactions to promote biodiversity and global food security.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Changing climatic conditions can lead to diminished overlap in the timing of flowering and pollinator foraging, potentially resulting in the weakening or loss of plant-pollinator interactions and reducing the fitness of both partners. However, several complexities of phenological shifts limit our ability to predict their consequences for plant-pollinator mutualisms. First, phenological shifts reflect the responses of individuals but are often summarized at the community, species, or population level, potentially obscuring variation that has important implications for interactions within and between species. Second, metrics of phenological asynchrony in pollination, such as temporal overlap between flowering and pollinator foraging, may not accurately characterize changes in interaction strength or fitness costs and benefits and thus are not true metrics of mismatch. Third, our focus has been on shifts in individual life-history events, such as flowering, rather than entire life cycles, despite the physiological integration of seasonal life-history stages (phenophases) that may be under different selection pressures. We suggest that we can advance our understanding of phenological shifts and their consequences for plants and pollinators by studying individual phenological variation in both partners across natural or experimental environmental gradients, measuring interaction rates and their fitness implications in addition to synchrony or overlap, and taking an integrated life cycle approach that can reveal trade-offs. Together, these approaches can yield temporally explicit fitness landscapes for plant and pollinator phenologies and improve our understanding of the consequences of climate change-induced phenological shifts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.