ArticleBJPsych open2025
Association of risk factors with mental illness in a rural community: insights from machine learning models.
Article in BJPsych open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMental health conditions, particularly depression and anxiety, are highly prevalent and impose substantial health burdens globally. Despite advancements in machine learning, there is limited application of these methods in predicting common mental illnesses within community populations in low-resource settings.
aimsThis study aims to examine the prevalence and associated risk factors of common mental illnesses collectively (depression and anxiety) in a rural Bangladeshi community using machine learning models.
methodThis cross-sectional study surveyed 490 adults aged 18-59 in a rural Bangladeshi community. Depression and anxiety were assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2) and Generalised Anxiety Disorder (GAD-2) scales. Machine learning models, including Categorical Boosting, the support vector machine, the random forest and XGBoost (eXtreme Gradient Boosting), were trained on 80% of the data-set and tested on 20% to evaluate predictive accuracy, precision, F1 score, log-loss and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC).
resultsSome 20.4% of participants experienced at least one common mental illness. Feature importance analysis identified house type, age group and educational status as the most significant predictors. SHAP (Shapley Additive exPlanations) values highlighted their influence on model outputs, and the XGBoost gain metric confirmed the importance of marital status and house type, with gains of 0.76 and 0.73, respectively. XGBoost delivered the best performance, achieving an F1 score of 71.01%, precision of 71.58%, accuracy of 71.15% and the lowest log-loss value of 0.56. The random forest had an accuracy of 78.21% and an AUC-ROC of 0.90.
conclusionsThe findings of this study suggest targeted interventions addressing housing and social determinants could improve mental health outcomes in similar rural settings. Further studies should consider longitudinal data to explore causal relationships.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.