Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40353489›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2025

Listening to Women's Voices: A Patient and Public Involvement Exercise Exploring Vulval Reconstructive Surgery for UK Women With Female Genital Mutilation (FGM).

Juliet Albert, Janet Fyle, Njomeza Kartallozi, Christie Coho, Naana Otoo-Oyortey, Hekate Papadaki, Catrin Evans, Dalia Saidan, Sohier Elneil, Natasha Anderson-Foster and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Juliet AlbertImperial College Division of Womens, Children and Clinical Support, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (ICHNT) and Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4686-7649
Janet FyleRoyal College of Midwives, London, UK.
Njomeza KartalloziDahlia Project, Manor Gardens, London, UK.
Christie CohoIndependent Psychological Therapist, London, UK.
Naana Otoo-OyorteyFORWARD, London, UK.
Hekate PapadakiDahlia Project, Manor Gardens, London, UK.
Catrin EvansSchool of Health Sciences, Centre for Evidence Based Healthcare, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5338-2191
Dalia SaidanCroydon University Hospital Urogynaecology and Pelvic Floor Reconstruction Unit, London, UK.
Sohier ElneilInstitute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK.
Natasha Anderson-FosterPsychosexual Therapist in Private Practice, Birmingham, UK.
Jasmine AbdulcadirHôpitaux Universitaires de Genève (HUG) clinic, Geneva, Switzerland.
Huda MohamedWhittington Hospital, London, UK.
Aurora AlmadoriDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.

Funding

Funding was awarded by the British Urology Foundation, Nurse and/or Clinician-led Small Research Project 2022-2025. Funds were also received from FORWARD UK for refreshments at national stakeholder events, and Dahlia Project provided venue, refreshments, creche facilities and travel vouchers for workshops' FGM survivor participants. J.A. had a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Clinical Doctoral Academic Fellowship (DCAF), which has funded her PhD at Nottingham University entitled: 'Exploring FGM specialist service provision in the UK and global north', contributing to some of the research behind this publication. J.A. is currently funded with a grant from the NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), a partnership between Imperial College London and ICHNT.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis article presents patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) work undertaken to explore FGM survivors' and stakeholders' views on reconstructive surgery, potential service models, care pathways, barriers to access and other support needs. The aim was to set research priorities, identify key themes and help inform subsequent research in the field.

methodsA national research collective was established comprising over 20 stakeholders, including FGM survivors/women with lived experience, healthcare professionals, academics and advocacy groups. The group undertook two discussion workshops with FGM survivors (n = 11 participants), two national stakeholder events (n = 142 attendees) and significant advocacy and partnership-building activities.

resultsKey insights were that FGM survivors would value reconstructive surgery to address body image concerns, genital pain and sexual difficulties. Potential barriers to surgery included stigma, safeguarding concerns, lack of awareness and fear. Significant gaps were identified around women's knowledge of clitoral anatomy, FGM types and specialist services. Survivors and stakeholders emphasised the need to complement surgical reconstruction with a comprehensive care pathway including trauma counselling and psychosexual therapy.

conclusionThis study highlights the importance of a survivor-led approach to FGM service development, as often the voices of FGM survivors are not included. The exercise demonstrated that, with the right approach, it is possible to engage 'minoritised communities/individuals from the global majority' and communities dispayed considerable willingness to participate in this sensitive research field. It also emphasises an urgent need for accessible, high-quality FGM care informed by the voices of those affected, to improve outcomes and support for FGM survivors in the United Kingdom. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Women with lived experience of FGM and women from FGM-affected communities, as well as other national stakeholders (including Non Government Organisation's and charities working with FGM survivors, academics, artists and campaigners were involved in the design and conduct of this study, analysis and interpretation of the data and preparation of the manuscript.

Indexed as

Circumcision, FemaleCommunity ParticipationPatient ParticipationPlastic Surgery ProceduresVulvaAdultBody ImageFemaleHumansMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSurvivorsUnited Kingdomco‐productionequality, diversity and inclusionfemale genital mutilationhealth inequalitiespatient and public involvement and engagementreconstruction surgeryunderserved communities

Identifiers

PMID40353489
PMCPMC12067389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.