ArticleCurrent medical imaging2025
LFE-UNet: A Lightweight Full-Encoder U-shaped Network for Efficient Semantic Segmentation in Medical Imaging
Article in Current medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSemantic segmentation algorithms are essential for identifying and segmenting human organs and lesions in medical images. However, as U-Net variants enhance segmentation accuracy, they often increase in parameter count, demanding more sophisticated and costly hardware for training.
objectiveThis study aims to introduce a lightweight U-Net that optimizes the trade-off between network parameters and segmentation accuracy, while fully leveraging the encoder's feature extraction capabilities.
methodsWe propose a lightweight full-encoder U-shaped network, termed LFE-UNet, which employs full-encoder skip connections, encompassing all encoder layers. This model is designed with a reduced number of basic channels-specifically, 8 instead of the typical 64 or 32-to achieve a more efficient architecture.
resultsThe LFE-UNet, when integrated with ResNet34, achieved a Dice score of 0.97385 on the ISBI LiTS 2017 liver dataset. For the BraTS 2018 brain tumor dataset, it obtained 0.87510, 0.93759, 0.87301, and 0.81469 on average, WT, TC, and ET, respectively. The paper also discusses the impact of varying basic channel numbers n and encoder layer counts N on the network's parameter efficiency, as well as the model's robustness to different levels of Gaussian noise in images and salt and pepper noise in labels. Additionally, the influence of different loss functions is explored.
conclusionThe LFE-UNet proves that high segmentation accuracy can be attained with a markedly lower parameters, fully utilizing the full-scale encoder's feature extraction. It also highlights the significance of loss function selection and the effects of noise on segmentation accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.