Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40353254›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in health services2025

Predictors of nurses' work-related mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: a paired follow-up study.

Cicilia Nagel, Kerstin Nilsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in health services, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Cicilia NagelDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Kerstin NilssonDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nurses are essential pillars of society, providing care for the sick. It is crucial for society to ensure that nurses have favorable working conditions, as they face a heightened risk of negative psychological conditions such as depression, anxiety, stress, and emotional exhaustion due to the demanding nature of their work. The strain on healthcare staff, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, has underscored these challenges. This study aimed to identify predictors of work-related mental health issues in nurses' work environments. In 2017, a questionnaire was distributed to 9,219 Swedish nurses, with 4,962 responses received. The questionnaire was redistributed during the pandemic in 2020, and 3,107 nurses responded. However, due to missing data and some nurses previously reporting a mental health diagnosis, only 2,030 questionnaires were included in the study. Among these, 143 nurses reported experiencing work-related mental health problems. The data was analyzed by logistic regression analysis, and 6 out of the 24 statements investigated were statistically significant ( Conclusions: This study revealed that work pace, recovery, support from colleagues, joy, meaningfulness, and development opportunities at work are particularly important for nurses' mental health. Actions in those areas are needed for nurses to have a sustainable work situation.

Indexed as

healthpsychological phenomenaregistered nursessocial supportworkplace

Identifiers

PMID40353254
PMCPMC12062014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.