ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2025
Variation in Arthroscopic Treatment of Discoid Lateral Meniscus and Postoperative Restrictions in Children: Results of a Multicenter Meniscus Study Group Survey.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Structural and Functional Biomechanical Classifications of the Discoid Meniscus.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Because of congenital abnormal collagenous structures and peripheral attachments, discoid lateral meniscus (DLM) is often associated with tears and instability and a risk of premature compartmental articular degeneration. Typically, surgery is indicated for symptomatic patients. Several surgical techniques have been described in the literature, but no studies have examined surgeon variation. Purpose: To determine the intersurgeon agreement for DLM surgical planning and postoperative restriction after arthroscopic assessment. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: Sixteen orthopaedic surgeons from an international pediatric meniscus study group were shown 4 different videos of a DLM arthroscopic procedure. Each surgeon completed a survey for each arthroscopic video. The survey included questions about operative planning, such as peripheral rim preservation, repair and stabilization technique, and postoperative restrictions. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the variables collected. Results: One of the 4 arthroscopic videos showed a complete discoid meniscus with no instability or tearing. For this specific meniscus, consensus was generally good, with 87.5% to 93.8% agreement for all the categories, except peripheral rim preservation, with 31.3% agreement. However, for the other 3 videos with tears and/or instability, consensus was generally low. Depending on the categories, the highest percentage of intersurgeon agreement varied between 25.0% and 62.5%, while being >50% only 2 of 27 times. Conclusion: Agreement regarding the surgical technique and postoperative rehabilitation among surgeons with experience in the treatment of DLM is poor in the event of tears and instability, which represent the greatest technical challenges with the most significant functional effect. Given the relative rarity of the condition and the implications on a child's long-term joint health, prospective, comparative multicenter studies regarding treatment algorithms and outcomes are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.