Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40353248›Full record

ArticleJournal of population ageing2025

Contextual Action Theory in Nursing Home Settings: A Conceptual Framework for Considering the Active Role of Residents.

Charlotte Jensen, Stephanie Chamberlain, Sheila K Marshall, Richard A Young, Matthias Hoben, Andrea Gruneir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of population ageing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Charlotte JensenDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1555-3033
Stephanie ChamberlainFaculty of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB Canada.
Sheila K MarshallSchool of Social Work, Division of Adolescent Health and Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC Canada.
Richard A YoungDepartment of Educational and Counselling Psychology, and Special Education, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC Canada.
Matthias HobenSchool of Health Policy and Management, York University, Toronto, ON Canada.
Andrea GruneirDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nursing home (NH) residents are often considered passive recipients of care with a limited role in shaping their experience. This perspective is often reproduced in NH research, which restricts resident participation, thereby upholding ageist views that cause discrimination of older adults living in NH settings. In this article, we propose using Contextual Action Theory (CAT) as a conceptual framework for exploring NH experiences in a way that incorporates the active role of residents. CAT supports the active role of NH residents by emphasizing the capabilities of human beings to form preferences and act on those preferences, without assumptions of rationality. The emphasis on human action allows researchers to consider NH experiences as co-constructed between residents, care providers, and family members, which means placing an emphasis on the actions and goals of NH residents, no matter their cognitive or physical impairments. CAT also supports personhood and social citizenship concerns in NH research, by acknowledging the differing preferences and thereby differing experiences of NH care by individual residents. We argue that CAT should be considered a useful framework for putting residents in the center of NH research.

Indexed as

AgencyCitizenshipNursing homePersonhoodQuality of careResident experience

Identifiers

PMID40353248
PMCPMC12062059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.