ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
Superficial Peroneal Nerve Motor Branch Transfer to the Deep Peroneal Nerve: Cadaveric Study and Case Report.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Foot drop carries substantial morbidity and is often due to deep peroneal (DPN) or common peroneal nerve (CPN) injury. Treatment options are limited. This study explored a new surgical approach by transferring a superficial peroneal nerve (SPN) branch to DPN. Cadaveric analysis, manual histomorphometry, and a case report are presented. Methods: Twenty-one limbs were analyzed. A reproducible surgical approach was used to identify CPN and trace it to the bifurcation into SPN and DPN, and then to the insertions into the peroneus longus (PL) and tibialis anterior (TA) muscles, respectively. Measurements were made from the superior most aspect of the fibular head to the bifurcation of the CPN, the insertion of the first and second SPN motor branches to the PL, and to the insertion of the DPN into the TA. The first SPN motor branch to the PL and DPN into the TA nerves were harvested, and histomorphological measurements of axonal densities were obtained. Results: Histomorphological analysis showed similar axonal densities between the transferred and target nerves, indicating a comparable potential for effective reinnervation. The mean distances from fibular head to various nerve branches were recorded to ensure tension-free transfer. No significant differences were found between nerve groups regarding axon density, total fascicle area, or total axon counts. Conclusions: This study supported feasibility of this nerve transfer technique, with initial results suggesting it represents a viable treatment option for foot drop secondary to DPN injury. Further research is needed to confirm these findings.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.