Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40353169›Full record

ArticleSurgical neurology international2025

Erroneous intramedullary placement of spinal cord stimulator: A case report and review of the literature.

Stephen Jaffee, Trent Kite, Dallas E Kramer, Nestor Tomycz

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical neurology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stephen JaffeeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, United States.
Trent KiteDepartment of Neurosurgery, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, United States.
Dallas E KramerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, United States.
Nestor TomyczDepartment of Neurosurgery, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Spinal cord stimulation is a common treatment for patients with medically refractory chronic neuropathic pain. Before permanent implantation of spinal cord stimulation, patients will undergo a percutaneous trial to ensure the efficacy of the treatment modality and determine the optimal location of placement. While complications from this procedure are rare, there are reports in the literature of infection, epidural hematoma, and even paralysis. There are few reports of percutaneous leads tracking through the spinal cord itself, and subsequently, few reports of management should such a complication take place. Herein, we provide an example of such a phenomenon with no significant postoperative complications, morbidity, or mortality. Case Description: A retrospective chart review was completed utilizing the electronic medical record. Data gathered included patient demographics, oncological history, medications, imaging, and operative reports. This is a 64-year-old male with a history of with a history of a traumatic brachial plexus avulsion and right upper extremity amputation at the shoulder after a motorcycle accident approximately 20 years prior presented to our institution with left upper extremity paresthesias, gain imbalance, and urinary incontinence after a permanent percutaneous spinal cord stimulation lead was placed from an outside institution. The patient was found to have the lead tracking through the intramedullary space of his spinal cord. The patient was taken to the operating room for removal of the lead and had no significant complications during his postoperative course. Conclusion: There is a paucity of literature regarding the removal of an intramedullary percutaneous spinal cord stimulator lead; herein, we present such a case.

Indexed as

Case reportIntramedullaryPainStimulation

Identifiers

PMID40353169
PMCPMC12065492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.