Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40353160›Full record

ArticleSurgical neurology international2025

Pineal parenchymal tumor of intermediate differentiation: Case series and literature review: Is it time for a consensus?

Siddharth Srinivasan, Ajay Hegde, Rajesh Nair, Ravi Teja Jampani, Mohammad Ashraf, Dhanwanth Chigurupati, Bharat Kumar Raju, Susanth Subramanian, Udgam Baxi, Yasaswi Kanneganti and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical neurology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Siddharth SrinivasanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Institute of Neurosciences, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Ajay HegdeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Manipal Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Rajesh NairDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kasturba Medical College and Hospital, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Ravi Teja JampaniDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kasturba Medical College and Hospital, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Mohammad AshrafDepartment of Neurosurgery, Institute of Neurological Sciences, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Dhanwanth ChigurupatiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Institute of Neurological Sciences, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Bharat Kumar RajuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kasturba Medical College and Hospital, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Susanth SubramanianDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kasturba Medical College and Hospital, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Udgam BaxiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kasturba Medical College and Hospital, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Yasaswi KannegantiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kasturba Medical College and Hospital, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Sarah JohnsonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States.
Bhavna NayalDepartment of Pathology, Kasturba Medical College and Hospital, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Geeta VasudevanDepartment of Pathology, Kasturba Medical College and Hospital, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Deepak NayakDepartment of Pathology, Kasturba Medical College and Hospital, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Girish MenonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kasturba Medical College and Hospital, Manipal, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pineal parenchymal tumor of intermediate differentiation (PPTID) is a rare tumor. This study aims to evaluate patient outcomes and propose a treatment algorithm based on existing literature and our case series. Methods: This prospective observational study includes seven patients diagnosed with PPTID through histopathology. We analyzed their clinical presentation, magnetic resonance imaging findings, surgical approaches, histopathological and immunohistochemical analysis, adjuvant treatments, and outcomes. We conducted univariate and multivariate statistical analyses. Results: The mean patient age was 40 years, with a male predominance. All patients presented with hydrocephalus, four of which required cerebrospinal fluid diversion procedures. The average tumor size was 3.13cm, with 85.7% showing brain invasion. Surgical outcomes included one gross total resection, two near total resections, and four subtotal resections. The supracerebellar infratentorial (Krause) approach was used in 71.4% of cases. About 85.7% were diagnosed with grade 3 PPTID. Five patients received adjuvant radiotherapy. The analysis showed each additional mitosis unit decreased survival by 0.17 units, equating to roughly 2 months ( Conclusion: We propose a treatment algorithm for PPTID and highlight the importance of further research to understand its biological characteristics. Safe maximal resection appears beneficial for higher-grade PPTID, but the role of adjuvant treatment after complete resection of lower-grade tumors remains uncertain.

Indexed as

HydrocephalusPineal glandPineal parenchymal tumorPineal parenchymal tumor of intermediate differentiationRadiotherapySafe maximal resection

Identifiers

PMID40353160
PMCPMC12065488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.