ArticleSurgical neurology international2025
Retrospective analysis of recurrence patterns and clinical outcomes in grade I-III meningiomas after surgery.
Article in Surgical neurology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Time-dependent Diffusion MRI-based Microstructural Mapping Value for Predicting Meningioma Grade, Subtype, and Proliferative Activity.Radiology. Imaging cancer · 2026Article
- Review
- Fluorescence-guided surgery combined with intraoperative photodynamic therapy for recurrent atypical and anaplastic intracranial meningiomas: a prospective feasibility study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Diagnostic performance of amide proton transfer-weighted imaging and four advanced diffusion-weighted MRI models for meningioma grading and subtyping.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The objective of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of meningioma patients with the World Health Organization (WHO) grades I-III who underwent surgical resection and identify factors influencing recurrence and survival. Methods: This retrospective study included patients who underwent surgery for meningioma at the National Brain Center Hospital between January 2020 and December 2022. Clinical characteristics of patients with recurrence, such as gender, age, preoperative Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS), grading, and history of radiotherapy, were recorded. The recurrence time was assessed within 2 years post-surgery. Magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography imaging results were used to determine meningioma location, while the WHO grading was based on pathological findings. Survival analysis of recurrence across different grades was performed using Kaplan-Meier curves. Results: Of the 184 patients who had surgical resection for meningioma, 53 (28.8%) experienced recurrence. The recurrence group consisted primarily of women (81%), with a preoperative KPS > 70% (83%), Simpson grading II-III (60.3%), WHO grade II (39.6%), and meningiomas located in the convexity (24.5%). Most patients (81.1%) had no history of radiotherapy, and 64.15% had two or more resections. The average recurrence-free period after surgery was 17.95 ± 20.39 months. Mortality due to recurrence was most common in the WHO grade II patients (11.1%). Kaplan-Meier curves showed differences in recurrence between grading subgroups, with the WHO grade III meningiomas exhibiting the highest recurrence rate and the worst prognosis. Conclusion: Higher-grade meningiomas are more likely to recur and result in poorer outcomes. Further research is needed to investigate tumor recurrence at the molecular level. A multidisciplinary approach to treatment improves outcomes and reduces complications associated with recurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.