ArticleSurgical neurology international2025
Efficacy of topical hemostatic agents in neurosurgery: An experimental study in a rat model.
Article in Surgical neurology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Intraoperative Agents for Hemostasis and Dural Reconstruction in Neurosurgery.Neurosurgery practice · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Few studies have compared different topical hemostatic agents in live models or brain tissue, and their doses are not standardized. Little is known about the combined use of these different elements in terms of efficacy and safety, especially in neurosurgery. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of different topic hemostatic agents used in daily neurosurgical practice in an experimental animal model study. Methods: A group of 42 Wistar rats was used. A stereotaxic frame was fixed, and coordinates were determined to locate the bregma. A 3 mm hole was drilled with a bone-profile burr on each side of the midline. A stylet was inserted into the brain to create the defect and induce bleeding. The rats were randomly divided into seven groups, with each group assigned a hemostatic agent. Hemostasis time and control time on the opposite side were measured. Results: Hemostasis was achieved after an average of 1 82 s in the group treated with Beriplast, making it the hemostatic agent that stopped the bleeding the fastest. The control time was an average of 40, 14 s. Compared with the negative control, all the agents resulted in significantly better hemostasis ( Conclusion: A reduction in postoperative bleeding positively impacts annual morbidity and mortality rates, hospitalization time, and hospital bed turnover. Understanding the efficacy and safety of different hemostatic agents will enable surgeons to optimize intraoperative hemostasis, thereby achieving better postoperative outcomes and increased patient safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.