ArticleGlobal advances in integrative medicine and health
Recruitment and Retention for an Acupuncture Trial in an Underrepresented 65 and Older Population With Chronic Low Back Pain.
Article in Global advances in integrative medicine and health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Acupuncture for Chronic Low Back Pain in Older Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2025Trial
- Baseline sample characteristics for the BackInAction pragmatic trial of acupuncture for chronic low back pain in older adults.Contemporary clinical trials · 2025Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The consequences of health disparities in underrepresented populations persist with increased disease burden and reduced access to care. Even with inclusion mandates, underserved populations are poorly represented across trials. This article describes recruitment and retention efforts of an underrepresented population in a large NIH-funded trial. Methods: The BackInAction (BIA) study is a pragmatic, multi-site, three-arm, parallel-groups randomized controlled trial testing the effectiveness of acupuncture needling for reducing back pain-related disability among 800 older adults (≥65 years) with chronic low back pain. The Institute for Family Health (IFH), an FQHC in New York City, one of four BIA sites, provides primary care to largely underrepresented patients. The IFH recruitment goal was 123 participants. PCPs were oriented to trial referral, clinical research coordinators worked as navigators, and electronic health records (EHR) mechanisms were adapted to allow seamless communication between trial acupuncturists and the research team. Results: IFH met its goal of 123 trial participants with sociodemographic (22.8% ≥ 75 yrs of age, 72.4% female, 59.4% reported having at least some college education, 62.6% reported an annual household income of less than $25 000) and ethnic/racial diversity (39.0% Hispanic, 35.6% Black, 22.0% White non-Hispanic, 26.8% Spanish-speaking). IFH study withdrawal rate was 12.2% with 18.7% missingness in follow-up data rates at the trial's 6-month primary endpoint. Conclusion: The IFH site team successfully recruited and retained diverse participants through trusted connections with the study population, building on experience with acupuncture research, engaging PCPs, study team members, primary care clinical sites and EHR communication options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.