ArticleAging medicine (Milton (N.S.W))2025
Comparison of Clinical Scores for Predicting Stroke-Associated Pneumonia After Acute Ischemic Stroke.
Article in Aging medicine (Milton (N.S.W)), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- European stroke organisation guideline on stroke-associated pneumonia.European stroke journal · 2026Guideline
- Article
- Gut dysbiosis, metabolic signals, and pulmonary immune reprogramming: decoding the gut microbiota -immune axis in stroke-associated pneumonia.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Construction and multi-center validation of a model based on blending ensemble learning for predicting stroke-associated pneumonia following acute ischemic stroke.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- Stroke-associated pneumonia in Japanese acute care settings: incidence and preliminary validation of risk prediction scores.BMC neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To compare the discrimination and calibration of six risk scoring systems in the assessment of patients with stroke-associated pneumonia (SAP) after acute ischemic stroke. Methods: The validation cohort was derived from the Third China National Stroke Registry. SAP was diagnosed according to the criteria for hospital-acquired pneumonia of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test were used to assess discrimination and calibration. Results: A total of 12,071 patients were included in the study and 606 (5.02%) patients were diagnosed with in-hospital SAP after ischemic stroke. The AUROC of the six clinical scores ranged from 0.660 to 0.752. In the pairwise comparison, the AIS-APS score (0.752, 95% CI = 0.730-0.773, Conclusions: Our study compared the discrimination and calibration of the Kwon Pneumonia Score, A2DS2 score, PANTHERIS score, AIS-APS score, ISAN score, and PASS score in SAP identification; of these, the AIS-APS score showed the best performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.