ArticleBiomarkers in neuropsychiatry2025
Cognitive performance and differentiation of B-SNIP psychosis Biotypes: Algorithmic Diagnostics for Efficient Prescription of Treatments (ADEPT) - 2.
Article in Biomarkers in neuropsychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mapping the psychosis spectrum - imaging neurosubtypes from multiscale functional network connectivity.Molecular psychiatry · 2026Article
- Interventions in schizophrenia should be transdiagnostic, biologically informed, individualized, and disease modifying.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2026Article
- Volume and Tempo: Cortical Excitability and Trial-to-Trial Consistency of Auditory Responses Distinguish Psychosis Biotypes.Research square · 2026Article
- Associations of social and genetic background variables to neuro-cognitive biomarkers of psychosis.Biomarkers in neuropsychiatry · 2025Article
- Differentiating biomarker features and familial characteristics of B-SNIP psychosis Biotypes.Translational psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: The B-SNIP consortium validated neurobiologically defined psychosis Biotypes (BT1, BT2, BT3) using cognitive and psychophysiological measures. B-SNIP's biomarker panel is not practical for most settings. Previously, B-SNIP developed an efficient classifier of Biotypes using only clinical assessments (called ADEPT-CLIN) with acceptable accuracy (~.81). Adding cognitive performance may improve ADEPT's performance. Method: Clinical assessments from ADEPT-CLIN plus 18 cognitive measures from 1907 individuals with a B-SNIP psychosis Biotype were used to create an additional diagnostic algorithm called ADEPT-COG. Extremely randomized trees were used to create this low burden classifier. Results: Total Biotype classification accuracy peaked at 94.6 % with 65 items. A reduced set of 18 items showed 90.5 % accuracy. Only 9-10 items achieved a one-vs-all (e.g., BT1 or not) accuracy of ~.95, considerably better than using clinical assessments alone. The top discriminators of psychosis Biotypes were antisaccade proportion correct, BACS total, symbol coding, antisaccade correct response latency, verbal memory, digit sequencing, stop signal reaction times, stop signal proportion correct, Tower of London, and WRAT Reading. Except for anti-saccade proportion correct and Tower of London, there was no overlap of the top discriminating items for B-SNIP Biotypes and DSM psychosis categories. Conclusions: This low-burden algorithm using clinical and cognitive measures achieved high classification accuracy and can support Biotype-specific etiological and treatment investigations in clinical and research environments. It may be especially useful for clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.