ArticleMedical science educator2025
Pilot Study on Using Large Language Models for Educational Resource Development in Japanese Radiological Technologist Exams.
Article in Medical science educator, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Psychometric properties and detectability of GPT-4o-generated multiple-choice questions compared with human-authored items across imaging specialties.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Large Language Models for the National Radiological Technologist Licensure Examination in Japan: Cross-Sectional Comparative Benchmarking and Evaluation of Model-Generated Items Study.JMIR medical education · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, we explored the potential application of large language models (LLMs) to the development of educational resources for medical licensure exams in non-English-speaking contexts, focusing on the Japanese Radiological Technologist National Exam. We categorized multiple-choice questions into image-based, calculation, and textual types. We generated explanatory texts using Copilot, an LLM integrated with Microsoft Bing, and assessed their quality on a 0-4-point scale. LLMs achieved high performance for textual questions, which demonstrated their strong capability to process specialized content. However, we identified challenges in generating accurate formulas and performing calculations for calculation questions, as well as in interpreting complex medical images in image-based questions. To address these issues, we suggest using LLMs with programming functionalities for calculations and using keyword-based prompts for medical image interpretation. The findings highlight the active role of educators in managing LLM-supported learning environments, particularly by validating outputs and providing supplementary guidance to ensure accuracy. Furthermore, the rapid evolution of LLM technology necessitates continuous adaptation of utilization strategies to align with their advancing capabilities. In this study, we underscored the potential of LLMs to enhance educational practices in non-English-speaking regions, while addressing critical challenges to improve their reliability and utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.