ArticleMedical science educator2025
Navigating the AI Revolution in Medicine-Adopting Strategies for Medical Education.
Article in Medical science educator, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Why and how the long case became the OSLER-the sum of the parts.Irish journal of medical science · 2026Article
- Transforming Human-AI Collaboration in Emergency Care: The Role of AI in Adaptive Support Across Diagnostic Reasoning Modes.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026Article
- An artificial intelligence application framework for nursing education: a scoping review based on the KAS model.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- ChatGPT-Assisted Patient Counselling in Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media (CSOM): A Pilot Feasibility Study.Journal of otology · 2026Article
- Framework for AI integration into the undergraduate medical curricula: a scoping review.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence readiness and its association with artificial intelligence literacy among Chinese medical students: a latent profile analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Transforming clinical reasoning-the role of AI in supporting human cognitive limitations.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into healthcare is set to fundamentally transform the role of medical professionals. This article takes a dive into the future specifying several strategies to prepare medical and other health professions students for an AI-driven healthcare system. It highlights the current and potential applications of AI in healthcare and discusses, in the immediate term, the necessity of incorporating AI education into medical curricula, including hands-on training and interdisciplinary collaboration. With a view to a more distant future, it also addresses probable ethical considerations, the evolving roles of healthcare professionals, a need for contingency and emphasises the importance of maintaining clinical skills amidst AI advancements. These strategies all aim to equip future medical graduates with competencies in knowledge, skills, and ethical grounding required to thrive in an AI-dominated healthcare environment. This framework is intended to stimulate discussion and provide a foundation upon which more detailed, context-specific strategies can be developed by educators, policymakers, and other stakeholders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.