Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40353029›Full record

ArticleMedical science educator2025

ChatGPT in Dental Education: Enhancing Student Proficiency in Informed Consent.

Les Kalman, Arman Danesh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science educator, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Les KalmanSchulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, 1151 Richmond Street, London, ON N6A 5B7 Canada.
Arman DaneshFaculty of Dental Medicine and Oral Health Sciences, McGill University, 2001 McGill College Ave, Montreal, QC H3A 1G1 Canada.ORCID 0009-0000-8827-0256

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a scarcity of research regarding how ChatGPT can be integrated in dental curricula to develop the understanding of students regarding informed consent. Our study implemented an educational exercise where D3 dental students compared ChatGPT-generated consent forms with professionally validated consent forms, qualitatively assessing the educational value that the chatbot provides in this setting. The findings of the present study encourage dental educators to acknowledge the importance of supervised learning in helping the next generations of dentists prepare for the safe use of AI technologies, such as ChatGPT, in their future practice.

Indexed as

Artificial-intelligenceDental-educationDentistryInformed-consent

Identifiers

PMID40353029
PMCPMC12058553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.