Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40353028›Full record

ArticleMedical science educator2025

A Survey of Medical Ethics Curricula at 11 US Medical Schools.

H Alexander Chen, Jason Silva-Rudberg, John Encandela

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science educator, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

H Alexander ChenDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4185-7716
Jason Silva-RudbergDepartment of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7663-2894
John EncandelaDepartment of Psychiatry, Center for Medical Education, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4017-7161

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Medical ethics education is crucial for equipping future physicians with the knowledge and skills needed to navigate complex moral decision-making in medical practice. However, the approaches various medical schools take to achieve this have been largely understudied. This investigation aimed to describe the current state of medical ethics education across a range of schools to inform future curriculum development. Methods: A case study design was used to synthesize data from interviews with ethics curriculum educators at 11 US medical schools. Both descriptive and qualitative content analyses were performed on these interviews. Results: The study found significant variability in nearly every examined area, including contact hours (ranging from 6 to 137.5 h), course content, methods of instruction, and assessment. Most schools tended to integrate ethics into larger courses rather than teach it independently. However, significant vertical integration (i.e., ethics content distributed in all curricular phases) was observed at only a small minority of schools. Qualitative themes revealed several barriers to vertical integration, such as the dilution of ethics content within larger topics, concentration of ethics content in the preclinical phase, and overall competition for curricular time. An additional theme concerned the flexibility within ethics curricula. Conclusion: Most of the reviewed schools' ethics curricula lacked comprehensive vertical integration-something that can be achieved with careful planning. We present an integrative model based on discussions with the minority of schools that have successfully integrated ethics seamlessly into their curricula.

Indexed as

CurriculumCurriculum reviewMedical educationMedical ethicsUndergraduate medical educationVertical integration

Identifiers

PMID40353028
PMCPMC12058593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.