ArticleMedical science educator2025
Peer Observation and Feedback for Small Group Facilitators in Medical Education.
Article in Medical science educator, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current Practices for Evaluating Clinical Supervisors in North American Genetic Counseling Programs.Journal of genetic counseling · 2026Article
- Impact of peer assessment on lecture quality and student learning outcomes in undergraduate medical education: a quasi-experimental study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- A Blended Case-Based and Practical Training Framework for Graduate Ultrasound Education: A Perspective on Competency-Based Instruction.Advances in medical education and practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Volunteer medical faculty with variable teaching experience often facilitate small groups for medical students. An initiative was designed to provide observation and feedback to pre-clerkship small group facilitators at our medical school, with 147 faculty participants over 2 years. The majority of respondents to a program evaluation survey found the observation moderately (44.7%) to extremely (23.7%) helpful. In total, 64.9% of respondents implemented some feedback into their teaching, and 64.9% felt that the program should be mandatory. Direct observation and feedback provided a well-received addition to the culture of deliberate practice that medical educators hope to foster. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-024-02252-0.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.