Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40352978›Full record

ArticleMedical science educator2025

Adapting Team-Based Learning for Medical Education: A Case Study with Scalable and Resource-Efficient Implementation.

Michaela Jansen, Irina Kim Cavdar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science educator, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michaela JansenDepartment of Cell Physiology and Molecular Biophysics, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center School of Medicine, Lubbock, TX 79430 USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1325-9700
Irina Kim CavdarDepartment of Cell Physiology and Molecular Biophysics, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center School of Medicine, Lubbock, TX 79430 USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Team-based learning (TBL) is a structured collaborative learning strategy where students are able to apply conceptual knowledge in small groups through a sequence of activities comprised of preparation, individual readiness assurance testing, teamwork, and team readiness assurance testing, typically followed by an application exercise. TBL has been gaining popularity in many education institutions and programs across the world and in the USA. This study marks the beginning of implementing TBL as a major active learning modality at Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center School of Medicine. Through this initiative, we present TBL as a versatile and adaptable method to improve students' learning and examination outcomes. Methods: TBL sessions are conducted in three steps: pre-class preparation, in-class readiness assurance testing, and application-focused exercise. The present study used a modified or abbreviated format, consisting of pre-class preparation and in-class individual readiness assurance test (iRAT) and team readiness assurance test (tRAT) followed by immediate feedback. A Pilot Phase was used to engage early-adopter faculty and optimize session parameters, and an Implementation Phase was used for one organ system, with both phases in the pre-clerkship curriculum and a class size of 180 students. During the Pilot Phase, student participation was voluntary, whereas in the Implementation Phase, participation counted towards a selective session attendance requirement. Therefore, student numbers were significantly smaller during the Pilot Phase supporting gradual optimization of session organization. Results: iRAT, tRAT, and summative end of organ system section National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) scores were analyzed. We find that participation in an increasing number of TBLs was associated with increased iRAT scores and a decreased performance gap between highest and lowest performers, where the increase in the scores of lowest performers was more substantial than the increase in the scores of highest performers. NBME score analysis showed that TBL participation increased examination performance by an average of 2.4% per TBL session attended. Conclusions: We present an implementation strategy for TBL sessions using a two-phased approach. Our process implementation provides a clear roadmap for other health professions or medical schools to implement TBL format sessions in their specific educational context. Importantly, the unique, abbreviated TBL format presented here facilitates implementation and adaptation. Observed learning strategies during tRAT that have been demonstrated to be effective include elaboration, dual coding, specific examples, interleaving, and retrieval practices. Overall, the results indicate a positive impact of TBL participation on final summative exam scores. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-024-02246-y.

Indexed as

Active learningImplementationTeam-based learning

Identifiers

PMID40352978
PMCPMC12058633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.