ArticleInternational journal of integrated care
An Integrated Specialised Care Approach for Families with Multiple, Severe, and Enduring Problems: A Qualitative Evaluation.
Article in International journal of integrated care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transitioning from child and adolescent psychiatry to follow-up care: a concept mapping study.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2026Article
- Preferences and heterogeneity in care service needs among disabled older adults in an urban setting.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- A Balancing Act: Partnership Dynamics in Practice When Organising and Developing Integrated Care Initiatives.International journal of integrated careArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: To realize an integrated specialised care approach for families with multiple, severe, and enduring problems, specialised teams providing integrated care are emerging. In this qualitative evaluation, we aimed to gain insight into the key elements promoting an integrated specialised care approach at the level of professionals by studying five Specialist Integrated care Teams (SITs). Methods: Perspectives of families, professionals, managers, and policymakers were gathered by conducting 52 semi-structured interviews. Additionally, 40 observations of case meetings were conducted. A theory-driven framework method was applied to analyse the transcripts both deductively and inductively. Results: Five key elements promoting an integrated specialised care approach were identified: i) a broad view on families, ii) an integration of specialised perspectives, iii) providing specialised care flexible and timely, iv) working from families' preferences and needs, and v) organising a well-structured care process and multidisciplinary evaluations. Discussion: When providing integrated specialised care, a family-centred focus, flexibility to tailor care within a well-structured care process, and investing in collaborative relationships with families are key. Conclusion: Although SITs are a promising form of an integrated specialised care approach, ensuring integrated care is the responsibility of every professional and (specialised) care service involved in families' care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.