ArticleJournal of family & reproductive health2025
Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes of Pregnant Women With Seasonal Influenza, A Single-Center Study.
Article in Journal of family & reproductive health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Influenza causes significant mortality and morbidity in pregnant women and neonates especially in developing countries. This study aimed to investigate the maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnant women with influenza and compare them with non-infected mothers. Materials and methods: This case-control single-center cohort study was conducted during the influenza season in 2022 and included all pregnant women with influenza during pregnancy. Baseline characteristics including age, body mass index, job, vaccination, and ethnicity were documented and outcomes including premature rupture of membranes (PROM), preterm labor, cesarean section, neonatal distress, and neonatal hospitalization were evaluated and compared with the control group. Results: In this study 39 pregnant women in each case and control group were evaluated. There was no significant difference in demographic data between the two groups. None of the participants in the case group received the influenza vaccine during pregnancy. The rate of cesarean section (63.2% vs 43.5%), neonatal distress (38.5% vs 12.8%), and neonatal hospitalization (43.5% vs 15.3%) was significantly higher in the case group than in healthy women (P-value=0.022, 0.010, 0.006 respectively). Although, the rate of PROM was not significantly different between the two groups (P=0.556). Preterm labor was higher in the case group than in the control group, but the difference was insignificant (P=0.135). Conclusion: The study findings suggest that pregnant women infected with influenza are at higher risk of neonatal complications and vaccination is helpful in these mothers as preventive measures to reduce complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.