ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2025
Put the control back in the control condition: are brown, pink, and white noise neutral control stimuli?
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Decoding child speech in silence and noise: The type of background noise shapes adults' processing.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2025-10-12Error in Methods · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: What are good control stimuli for music perception research? Systematic evaluations of control suitability remain limited. We wanted to examine if control stimuli (brown, pink, white noise, and voice recordings) lead to different emotional ratings in themselves. Methods: Across two separate studies (n = 84, and 1280, respectively), participants assessed brown, pink, and white noise and voice recordings using a music-emotional perception scale with variations. We used the GEMS-9 scale, and the GEMS-9 scale with the second-order factors 'sublime', 'uneasy', and 'vital'. Results: Our two studies show that brown noise was considered more sublime than white and pink noise, while white noise was considered more uneasy than brown noise, pink noise, and voice recordings in both studies. Discussion: Brown, pink, and white noise is rated emotionally above 3 on unease on a scale from 1 to 7. This means that none of the noise stimuli had minimal emotional ratings and therefore had an emotional effect in themselves. Out of the three noise stimuli, white noise had the highest ratings of unease across both studies. Only voice recordings were considered neutral, defined as having consistently minimal emotional ratings in both studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.