Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40352908›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2025

Put the control back in the control condition: are brown, pink, and white noise neutral control stimuli?

Ulvhild H Færøvik, Kjetil Vikene, Karsten Specht

RetractedAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ulvhild H FærøvikDepartment of Biological and Medical Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Kjetil VikeneDepartment of Biological and Medical Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Karsten SpechtDepartment of Biological and Medical Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: What are good control stimuli for music perception research? Systematic evaluations of control suitability remain limited. We wanted to examine if control stimuli (brown, pink, white noise, and voice recordings) lead to different emotional ratings in themselves. Methods: Across two separate studies (n = 84, and 1280, respectively), participants assessed brown, pink, and white noise and voice recordings using a music-emotional perception scale with variations. We used the GEMS-9 scale, and the GEMS-9 scale with the second-order factors 'sublime', 'uneasy', and 'vital'. Results: Our two studies show that brown noise was considered more sublime than white and pink noise, while white noise was considered more uneasy than brown noise, pink noise, and voice recordings in both studies. Discussion: Brown, pink, and white noise is rated emotionally above 3 on unease on a scale from 1 to 7. This means that none of the noise stimuli had minimal emotional ratings and therefore had an emotional effect in themselves. Out of the three noise stimuli, white noise had the highest ratings of unease across both studies. Only voice recordings were considered neutral, defined as having consistently minimal emotional ratings in both studies.

Indexed as

brown noisecontrol conditioncontrol stimuliGEMS-9pink noisewhite noise

Identifiers

PMID40352908
PMCPMC12062116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.