ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2025
A novel hybrid method based on task-related component and canonical correlation analyses (H-TRCCA) for enhancing SSVEP recognition.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Improved SSVEP Classification Through EEG Artifact Reduction Using Auxiliary Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) based on steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEP) rely on the brain's response to visual stimuli. However, accurately recognizing target frequencies using training-based methods remains challenging due to the time-consuming calibration sessions required by subject-specific training methods. Method: To address this limitation, this study proposes a novel hybrid method called Hybrid task-related component and canonical correlation analysis (H-TRCCA). In the training phase, four spatial filters are derived using canonical correlation analysis (CCA) to maximize the correlation between the training data and reference signals. Additionally, a spatial filter is also computed using task-related component analysis (TRCA). In the test phase, correlation coefficients obtained from the CCA method are clustered using the k-means++ clustering algorithm. The cluster with the highest average correlation identifies the candidate stimuli. Finally, for each candidate, the correlation values are summed and combined with the TRCA-based correlation coefficients. Results: The H-TRCCA algorithm was validated using two publicly available benchmark datasets. Experimental results using only two training trials per frequency with 1s data length showed that H-TRCCA achieved average accuracies of 91.44% for Dataset I and 80.46% for Dataset II. Additionally, it achieved maximum average information transfer rates of 188.36 bits/min and 139.96 bits/min for Dataset I and II, respectively. Discussion: Remarkably H-TRCCA achieves comparable performance to other methods that require five trials, utilizing only two or three training trials. The proposed H-TRCCA method outperforms state-of-the-art techniques, showing superior performance and robustness with limited calibration data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.