ReviewFrontiers in public health2025
Mental health at work: a practical framework for employers.
Review in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preliminary findings from a brief psychodynamic counseling program for university staff: users' psychological characteristics and implications for the program's utility.Research in psychotherapy (Milano) · 2026Article
- Employer-provided workplace health promotion activities in Poland: evidence from a nationwide cross-sectional survey of full-time employees.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Corporate Governance and Workplace Mental Health Practices: The Mediating Role of Structured Occupational Safety and Health Engagement.Safety and health at work · 2026Article
- Urban-rural differences in depressive symptoms and related factors among employed middle-aged and older adults: a national cross-sectional study in China.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Occupational burnout in information technology workers.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- An economic model to assess the costs and benefits of workplace mental wellbeing interventions: A flexible tool for employers and decision makers.PLOS mental health · 2026Article
- Cross-cultural impact of information anxiety on employee mental health in digital workplaces: a comparative study between Chinese and Western contexts.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Does emotional intelligence mediates workplace stress, mindfulness, person-job-fit, and mental health among bank employees.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- The crisis we are not naming: The psychology of capitalism.The British journal of social psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mental health is a universal issue critical not only to individual health and well-being, but also to workforce sustainability and organizational performance. Leaders increasingly understand the imperative to support workers' mental health but are often unsure of where to start or how to prioritize their actions. Numerous guidance documents for employers have emerged in recent years, but without conducting their own needs and risk assessment and evaluating the policies and practices they have in place, employers are left unaware of specific risks their workers face, effectiveness of their current practices, and actions they could take that would have the greatest positive impact. To address this gap, Columbia University's Mental Health + Work Design Lab, mental health non-profit One Mind at Work, and corporate ethical standards measurement company Ethisphere partnered to develop a comprehensive framework and corresponding self-assessment to help employers evaluate their organizational-level workforce mental health efforts and strategically invest in evidence-based practices. In this article, we detail the range of organizational-level practices necessary to effectively support and advance workforce mental health and present a framework for assessing and improving these efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.