Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40352825›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Factors influencing adoption intentions to use AIGC for health information: findings from SEM and fsQCA.

Jing Liu, Xiaohan Chen, Chengzhi Liu, Pu Han

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jing LiuSchool of Management, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing, China.
Xiaohan ChenSchool of Management, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing, China.
Chengzhi LiuSchool of Management, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing, China.
Pu HanSchool of Management, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: With the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence technologies, AI-generated content (AIGC) was increasingly applied in the health information sector, becoming a vital tool to enhance the efficiency and quality of health information exchange. Purpose: This research investigated the motivations behind users' adoption with AIGC during health information searches, aiming to advance public health management and technological innovation in health information. Methods: The study employed a model constructed from the UTAUT and the Health Belief Model. Comprehensive analysis of survey data was conducted using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) and Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA). Data handling and model verification were performed using SPSS 27, SmartPLS 4, and fsQCA 4.1 software tools. Results: The SEM results reveal that performance expectancy, effort expectancy, perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, perceived benefits, perceived barriers, and self-efficacy significantly positively influence adoption intentions, while facilitating conditions showed no significant effect. Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis identifies two pathways that trigger adoption intention: Comprehensive Support and Health-Dominated. Conclusion: The study integrates the UTAUT and HBM in the context of health information technology adoption intention and employs a hybrid approach to deepen understanding of user behavior in the health information environment. Further exploration of emerging theories suitable for the rapidly evolving field of health information technology is still needed.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceIntentionAdultFemaleFuzzy LogicHumansLatent Class AnalysisMaleMiddle AgedMotivationSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultadoption intentionAIGChealth belief modelhealth informationUTAUT

Identifiers

PMID40352825
PMCPMC12062143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.