Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40352797›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical treatment and research2025

Breast cancer implant reconstructive surgery and radiotherapy: a retrospective analysis of medical records.

Ji Young Yun, Ki Jung Ahn, Hyunjung Kim, Hee Yeon Kim, Tae Hyun Kim, Kyung Do Byun, Ji Sun Park, Yunseon Choi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical treatment and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ji Young YunDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8129-1417
Ki Jung AhnDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5163-0040
Hyunjung KimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5247-1395
Hee Yeon KimDepartment of General Surgery, Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2519-8837
Tae Hyun KimDepartment of General Surgery, Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6675-8872
Kyung Do ByunDepartment of General Surgery, Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9856-6517
Ji Sun ParkDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7110-6297
Yunseon ChoiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1397-6753

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to analyze whether the occurrence of complications increases if radiotherapy (RT) is administered after breast reconstructive surgery using implants. Methods: This retrospective study included 80 patients who underwent breast reconstruction using implants, of which 16 (20.0%) underwent RT. Most patients underwent conventional fractionated RT (n = 13), and hypofractionated RT was performed in 3 patients. Most patients (n = 51, 63.8%) underwent delayed reconstruction, which involved implant replacement after tissue expander insertion. Only 29 patients (36.3%) underwent immediate reconstruction simultaneously with breast cancer surgery. Results: The median postoperative follow-up was 39.9 months (range, 8.7-120.3 months). Complications occurred in 18 (22.5%); infection/necrosis (n = 8), leakage/rupture (n = 8), and capsular contracture (n = 2). Infection/necrosis is common in patients undergoing RT. Complications occurred in 4 patients (25.0%) who received RT and 14 (21.9%) who did not receive RT, and complications did not significantly increase with RT (P = 0.511). There was no overall difference in complications between the immediate (4 of 29) and delayed (14 of 51) reconstruction groups (P = 0.129). Nine patients underwent reoperation because of complications; 3 (18.8%) received RT and 6 (9.4%) did not receive RT. The reoperation rate did not increase significantly with RT (P = 0.254). There were 3 cases of recurrence, and patients who received RT had no recurrence. Conclusion: RT did not significantly increase the complication or reoperation rates if reconstructive surgery was performed using implants. Therefore, RT should be performed in patients at a high risk of recurrence.

Indexed as

Breast neoplasmsComplicationsImplant reconstructive surgeryRadiotherapyReoperation

Identifiers

PMID40352797
PMCPMC12059242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.