ArticleJournal of orthopaedics2025
Evaluating the learning curve and outcomes of a new rectangular femoral stem in total hip arthroplasty: A comparative study.
Article in Journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a widely successful procedure, but the adoption of new femoral stems is often met with hesitation due to concerns regarding a learning curve and potential complications. This study evaluates the impact of introducing a new rectangular femoral stem by comparing radiographic, clinical, and functional outcomes with those of an established metaphyseal loading stem. Methods: A retrospective comparative study was conducted between January 2022 and January 2024. Patients were categorized into three groups: (1) control group receiving an established metaphyseal loading stem, (2) "learning curve" group (first half of patients receiving the new rectangular stem), and (3) "experienced" group (second half of patients receiving the rectangular stem). Primary outcomes included femoral stem subsidence and diaphyseal canal filling. Secondary outcomes comprised Oxford Hip Scores (OHS), EQ-5D-5L scores, length of hospital stay, complications, and readmission rates. Statistical analysis utilized ANOVA and chi-square tests, with significance set at p < 0.05. Results: A total of 115 patients (33 control, 41 learning curve, 41 experienced) were included. No significant differences were found in demographics. Subsidence was comparable across groups (p = 0.381). AP canal filling showed no significant differences (p = 0.839), but lateral canal filling was greater in the rectangular stem groups ( Conclusion: The introduction of a new rectangular femoral stem did not result in a significant learning curve affecting subsidence, complications, or functional outcomes. The stem demonstrated improved lateral canal filling and was associated with reduced hospital stay, suggesting a safe transition to this design without compromising early outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.