ArticleMethodsX2025
Air purifiers in classrooms: Effect on air quality, thermal comfort, lung function, and academic performance in a pragmatic controlled trial with counterbalanced crossover interventions.
Article in MethodsX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This protocol investigates the relationship between indoor air quality (IAQ) and respiratory health as well as academic performance in students. The effects of air purifiers in real-world educational settings on lung health and academic outcomes have not been extensively studied. Our objectives are to: (1) evaluate the effectiveness of low-cost air purifiers in improving IAQ; (2) assess their impact on children's lung function; and (3) examine their influence on academic performance. This prospective, pragmatic controlled trial involves students from two schools in central-southern Chile, with three classrooms at each school equipped with air purifiers over three weeks. IAQ is initially measured without purifiers, followed by two weeks of alternating between purifier models "A" and "B," with participants blinded to the brand of the devices. Measured outcomes include IAQ (PM 2.5, PM 10), lung function (peak flow measurements), and cognitive performance (memory, attention, language, and problem-solving). Confounding factors are controlled through guardian questionnaires and evaluations of outdoor air quality and weather conditions. Ethical approvals are obtained, and data collection is conducted during the winter of 2023.•A pragmatic controlled trial involving middle school students monitored and intervened during three weeks in selected classrooms to evaluate the impact of air purifiers.•Classrooms were equipped with air purifiers, and indoor air quality and thermal comfort was assessed both with and without the intervention, employing randomization and a blinding method for purifier brands in use.•Key outcomes on students were measured weekly, including environmental conditions, lung function, and academic performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.