Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40352753›Full record

ArticleCrystal growth & design2025

One Size Fits All? Development of the CPOSS209 Data Set of Experimental and Hypothetical Polymorphs for Testing Computational Modeling Methods.

Louise S Price, Matteo Paloni, Matteo Salvalaglio, Sarah L Price

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Crystal growth & design, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Louise S PriceDepartment of Chemistry, University College London, 20 Gordon Street, London WC1H 0AJ, U.K.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7633-1987
Matteo PaloniDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University College London, Torrington Place, London WC1E 7JE, U.K.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4841-9321
Matteo SalvalaglioDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University College London, Torrington Place, London WC1E 7JE, U.K.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3371-2090
Sarah L PriceDepartment of Chemistry, University College London, 20 Gordon Street, London WC1H 0AJ, U.K.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1230-7427

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Organic crystal structure prediction (CSP) studies have led to the rapid development of methods for predicting the relative energies of known and computer-generated crystal structures. There is a compromise between the level of theoretical treatment, its reliability across different types of organic systems, how its accuracy depends on the size and shape of the unit cell, and the size and the number of structures that can be modeled at an affordable computational cost. We have used our database of crystal structure prediction studies, often performed as a complement to experimental screening, to produce sets comprising 6 to 15 crystal structures, covering known polymorphs, observed packings of closely related molecules, and CSP-generated energetically competitive but distinct structures, for 20 organic molecules. These have been chosen to illustrate some of the issues that need consideration in any lattice energy method, seeking to be generally applicable to moderate-sized organic molecules, including small drug molecules. We included the methods of crystallization reported for the experimental polymorphs. In all of the examples, the original CSP used electronic structure calculations on the molecule to give the conformational energy and an anisotropic atom-atom model for the electrostatic intermolecular energy, combined with an empirical "exp-6" repulsion dispersion model to give the intermolecular lattice energy. The lattice energies and structures are compared with those obtained by reoptimizing with periodic, plane-wave, dispersion-corrected density functional theory, specifically PBE with the TS dispersion correction, and with single point energies where the many body dispersion (MBD) dispersion correction is applied, as an example of a widely used "workhorse" method. The use of this data set for a preliminary test of modeling methods is illustrated for two Machine Learned Foundation Models, MACE-MP-0 and MACE-OFF23. The challenges in modeling the putative and observed polymorphs for a range of molecules, their energies, and the possible level of agreement with experimental data are illustrated. Very similar molecules can differ significantly in the polymorphs observed, only partially reflecting the range of polymorph screening experiments used and the energetically competitive structures produced by CSP approaches based on a purely thermodynamic paradigm.

Identifiers

PMID40352753
PMCPMC12063060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.