ArticleCrystal growth & design2025
One Size Fits All? Development of the CPOSS209 Data Set of Experimental and Hypothetical Polymorphs for Testing Computational Modeling Methods.
Article in Crystal growth & design, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Assessing crystallisation behaviour in molecular crystals through particle rugosities.Communications chemistry · 2026Article
- BEST-CSP Benchmark Study of Polymorphs I and II of Sulfamerazine and the Perils of Polytype Polymorphs.Crystal growth & design · 2026Article
- Deciphering the complexities of crystalline state(s) with molecular simulations.Communications chemistry · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Organic crystal structure prediction (CSP) studies have led to the rapid development of methods for predicting the relative energies of known and computer-generated crystal structures. There is a compromise between the level of theoretical treatment, its reliability across different types of organic systems, how its accuracy depends on the size and shape of the unit cell, and the size and the number of structures that can be modeled at an affordable computational cost. We have used our database of crystal structure prediction studies, often performed as a complement to experimental screening, to produce sets comprising 6 to 15 crystal structures, covering known polymorphs, observed packings of closely related molecules, and CSP-generated energetically competitive but distinct structures, for 20 organic molecules. These have been chosen to illustrate some of the issues that need consideration in any lattice energy method, seeking to be generally applicable to moderate-sized organic molecules, including small drug molecules. We included the methods of crystallization reported for the experimental polymorphs. In all of the examples, the original CSP used electronic structure calculations on the molecule to give the conformational energy and an anisotropic atom-atom model for the electrostatic intermolecular energy, combined with an empirical "exp-6" repulsion dispersion model to give the intermolecular lattice energy. The lattice energies and structures are compared with those obtained by reoptimizing with periodic, plane-wave, dispersion-corrected density functional theory, specifically PBE with the TS dispersion correction, and with single point energies where the many body dispersion (MBD) dispersion correction is applied, as an example of a widely used "workhorse" method. The use of this data set for a preliminary test of modeling methods is illustrated for two Machine Learned Foundation Models, MACE-MP-0 and MACE-OFF23. The challenges in modeling the putative and observed polymorphs for a range of molecules, their energies, and the possible level of agreement with experimental data are illustrated. Very similar molecules can differ significantly in the polymorphs observed, only partially reflecting the range of polymorph screening experiments used and the energetically competitive structures produced by CSP approaches based on a purely thermodynamic paradigm.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.