Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40352727›Full record

ArticleiScience2025

A workflow for modeling radiolysis in chemically, physically, and geometrically complex scenarios.

Giuseppe De Salvo, Stefan Merkens, Andreas Körner, Birk Fritsch, Paolo Malgaretti, Andreas Hutzler, Andrey Chuvilin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Giuseppe De SalvoElectron Microscopy Laboratory, CIC nanoGUNE BRTA, Tolosa Hiribidea 76, 20018 Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain.
Stefan MerkensElectron Microscopy Laboratory, CIC nanoGUNE BRTA, Tolosa Hiribidea 76, 20018 Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain.
Andreas KörnerHelmholtz Institute Erlangen-Nürnberg for Renewable Energy (IET-2), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 91058 Erlangen, Germany.
Birk FritschHelmholtz Institute Erlangen-Nürnberg for Renewable Energy (IET-2), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 91058 Erlangen, Germany.
Paolo MalgarettiHelmholtz Institute Erlangen-Nürnberg for Renewable Energy (IET-2), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 91058 Erlangen, Germany.
Andreas HutzlerHelmholtz Institute Erlangen-Nürnberg for Renewable Energy (IET-2), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 91058 Erlangen, Germany.
Andrey ChuvilinElectron Microscopy Laboratory, CIC nanoGUNE BRTA, Tolosa Hiribidea 76, 20018 Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiation-based techniques contribute significantly to characterizing nanoscale samples across materials research but are frequently hampered by radiation-induced damage, particularly radiolysis in liquid media. The deep understanding and accurate modeling of radiation chemistry are crucial for interpreting experimental observations but are rarely sufficiently addressed in practice. We introduce a comprehensive workflow for numerically modeling radiolysis reaction kinetics in chemically, physically, and geometrically complex scenarios. The workflow streamlines the automatic composition of validated reaction networks from database files in a Python-based environment (AuRaCh tool) and their transfer to finite element computation environments (COMSOL Multiphysics software) for geometric and physical expansion. Its applicability is demonstrated in the context of liquid-phase electron microscopy but extends to other fields involving complex reaction networks. Model complexity is scrutinized, and potential simplifications are explored using characteristic numbers in experimentally relevant parameter regimes. The reported approach improves computational modeling and correlative experimental methods by promoting cross-community approaches.

Indexed as

ChemistryNatural sciencesPhysics

Identifiers

PMID40352727
PMCPMC12063123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.